Photo of Kevin LaCroix

Kevin LaCroix

Subscribe to Kevin LaCroix's Posts

Kevin M. LaCroix is an attorney and Executive Vice President, RT ProExec, a division of RT Specialty. RT ProExec is an insurance intermediary focused exclusively on management liability issues.

Follow:Read more about Kevin LaCroixKevin's Linkedin ProfileKevin's Twitter Profile

In the current heated DExit debate over whether companies incorporated in Delaware should reincorporate elsewhere (usually Texas or Nevada), one factor often cited is the expense of litigating in Delaware, usually as a shorthand reference to a contention that plaintiffs’ counsel’s fee awards in Delaware’s court are out of control. This argument typically cites to a few recent cases in which the fees awarded unquestionably were large; recent academic studies have taken the argument further to contend that the fees awarded in some cases were excessive.

However, a more recent study, based on a comprehensive overview of all Delaware court fee awards in the last ten years, challenges the premise that fee awards are out of control; the study finds, rather, that fee awards generally have been within reasonable bounds, and argues that a very small number of outliers should not drive the analysis of the issues. The study concludes that Delaware’s flexible approach to fee awards provides the appropriate incentives for plaintiffs’ counsel and includes safeguards to protect against excessive fee awards. Perhaps most significant in light of the current controversy is the study’s authors’ finding that “we find no evidence that Delaware fees are systematically excessive.”Continue Reading But ARE Plaintiffs’ Counsel Fee Awards in Delaware Excessive?

In a recent post, I noted the significant downturn in the amount of SEC enforcement activity during the 2025 fiscal year (ended September 20, 2025). What was true FY 2025 with respect to SEC enforcement activity in general was also true in particular with respect to SEC enforcement activity involving publicly traded companies. According to a new report, SEC enforcement activity against public companies and their subsidiaries also declined significantly during FY 20225. The report, written by Cornerstone Research in conjunction with the Securities Enforcement Empirical Database (SEED) of the NYU Pollack Center for Law & Business, contains a number of interesting observations about the level of enforcement activity in the agency’s final days under outgoing SEC Chair Gary Gensler, compared to the activity levels under the agency’s current Chair, Paul Atkins.Continue Reading Cornerstone Research: SEC Public Company Enforcement Actions Decline

Sarah Abrams

A recent series of U.S. Department of Justice actions highlights the agency’s focus on combatting so-called “pig-butchering” — a type of online financial scam where fraudsters build a long-term relationship with a victim to gain trust and then convince the victim to invest in fake cryptocurrency or trading schemes. In the following guest post, Sarah Abrams, Head of Claims Baleen Specialty, a division of Bowhead Specialty, takes a look at how developments in the crypto world coinciding with the DOJ’s crackdown may be creating increased D&O risk arising from pig-butchering schemes. I would like to thank Sarah for allowing me to publish her article on this site. Here is Sarah’s article.Continue Reading Guest Post: Another Emerging Cryptocurrency Risk for D&O Underwriters?

In the 2025 fiscal year (ended September 30, 2025), the SEC’s enforcement activity, as measured by the number of stand-alone enforcement actions, was at its lowest level in ten years. While the decline was reflected across many categories of SEC enforcement, there were certain specific areas – such as cases involving insider trading and market manipulation – where SEC activity actually increased. And notwithstanding the overall decline in SEC enforcement activity, there are signs to suggest that foreign companies listed on U.S. exchanges should be prepared heightened SEC scrutiny and enforcement activity, as discussed below.Continue Reading SEC Enforcement Actions Decline, But Foreign Cos. Should Remain Vigilant

The D&O Diary was on assignment in Florida last week, with stops in both Orlando and Miami. It is always a pleasure to be in Florida, even though this time the Orlando leg of the trip was unusually cold.

The primary purpose of the Orlando visit was to attend the annual Professional Liability Underwriting Society (PLUS) Conference. As always, the Conference was well-organized and well-attended. It was a pleasure to see so many old friends and to make new friends as well. It was gratifying to learn how many of the new members of our industry follow The D&O Diary. It was also my honor to be able to participate as a panelist for one of the sessions, as reflected in the picture below. My congratulations to the PLUS staff for another excellent event.Continue Reading Orlando and Miami: PLUS Conference and LatAm Underwriters’ Meeting

Lucas Roberts

Claims made insurance policies generally allow for the provision of notice of potential claim. However, for which insureds is the notice effective? In the following guest post, Lucas Roberts, Wholesale Broker, Anzen Insurance Solutions, reviews a recent court decision discussing these notice-related issues. I would like to thank Lucas for allowing me to publish his article as a guest post on this site. I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. Please contact me directly if you would like to submit a guest post. Here is Lucas’s article.Continue Reading Guest Post: Wait, YOU Also Wanted Coverage? Why Didn’t You Say So!

Sarah Abrams

The incidence of AI-related securities litigation is by this point well-established. But as the laws, regulations, and legal environment relating to AI have continued to evolve, so too has the AI-related litigation risk. In the following guest post, Sarah Abrams, Head of Claims Baleen Specialty, a division of Bowhead Specialty, examines the recent settlement of the securities class action litigation involving Snapchat and considers its potential implicationd for future AI-related litigation risk. I would like to thank Sarah for allowing me to publish her article as a guest post on this site. I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. Please contact me directly if you would like to submit a guest post. Here is Sarah’s article. Continue Reading Guest Post: Will the Snapchat Settlement Become a Benchmark For AI-Related Risk?

Class actions are of course much more a feature of the litigation scene in the U.S. than in the U.K, but things have been changing in recent years. The most significant initial change in direction toward collective actions in the U.K. was the adoption several years ago of “opt-out” actions in the U.K. Competition Appeal Tribunal proceedings. More recently, through its courts’ use of group litigation orders (GLOs), there has been a “surge in mass claims” in the U.K., according to a recent law memo. The result has been, according to the October 13, 2025, memo from the Skadden law firm, a “dramatic transformation” over the past decade in the U.K. of its “collective redress landscape.” The memo, which is entitled “Class Actions by the Backdoor? The Evolving Landscape of Group Litigation in the U.K,” can be found here.Continue Reading “Backdoor Class Actions”: Proliferating U.K. Collective Action Proceedings

As the story developed last month surrounding the spectacular collapse of auto-parts giant First Brands Group, I kept waiting for the lawsuit. The tale of the CEO’s supposed lavish personal spending, as well as the company’s massive debt and apparently missing funds, seemed scripted for a securities class action complaint. The securities suit I thought surely was coming never materialized – because, it turns out, Patrick James, the company’s founder and CEO, was also its sole equity owner. So, no shareholder suit. Which is not to say that there would never be a lawsuit.

Indeed, last week, the perhaps inevitable lawsuit did materialize, but not as a securities suit; rather, the lawsuit is in the form of an adversary proceeding against the former CEO and his affiliated entities brought by the company as debtor in its bankruptcy proceeding. And the complaint? It’s a doozy. And as discussed below, it also raises some interesting D&O insurance coverage questions as well.Continue Reading First Brands Sues Its Founder for “Grievous Misconduct”

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in the legal case in which the claimants are challenging the constitutionality of President Trump’s tariffs. While we await the Court’s decision in the case, the tariffs remain in place, with consequences both for the global economy and for individual businesses. In the latest example of the ways in which these consequences can translate into tariff-related securities litigation, a plaintiff shareholder has sued used car retailer CarMax, alleging that the company tried to portray the quarterly sales surge that preceded the tariffs’ impact as being due to longer-term company advantages rather than tariff-motivated consumer behavior. A copy of the new CarMax complaint can be found here.Continue Reading CarMax Hit with Tariff-Related Securities Suit