Securities Enforcement

Subscribe to Securities Enforcement

In recent days, SEC observers have speculated about who the new head of the agency will be in the incoming Trump Administration and what the new leadership might mean for the agency’s regulatory and enforcement agenda. While we await the upcoming changes, it is still worth asking what the agency has been up to from an enforcement standpoint in the most recently completed fiscal year (ended September 30, 2024). The agency’s recently issued enforcement activity report and a separate academic study of the agency’s enforcement activity against public companies and their subsidiaries both reveal some interesting and arguably unexpected information about what the agency has been doing. Among other things, the agency’s report shows that while the agency’s overall enforcement activity levels declined in the most recent fiscal year, the agency’s total recoveries were at record levels – but both of these observations require further discussion as well.Continue Reading SEC’s FY 2024 Enforcement Activity Declined While Total Financial Remedies Surged

In recent months, the SEC Chair and other government officials have made it clear that they are closely watching for companies that try to catch the AI wave by making exaggerated or false claims about the AI capabilities of their products or services. In the latest example of the crack down on these kinds of AI-related misrepresentations, both the U.S. Attorney  for the Southern District of New York and the SEC have filed charges against the former CEO and Chairman of the tech company Kubient. The government alleges that the executive, Paul Roberts, inflated the company’s revenues and also lied about one of its signature products, an AI-powered tool that was supposed to detect ad fraud in the digital advertising industry. There are some interesting features of the charges against Roberts, as discussed below.Continue Reading Tech Exec Charged with AI-Related Misrepresentations and Fraudulent Revenue Recognition

In an action the SEC’s two Republican Commissioners sharply criticized in a separately-issued statement, the SEC has filed settled charges against business communications services provider R.R. Donnelly & Sons (RRD) relating to the company’s disclosure and accounting controls in connection with cybersecurity incidents the company suffered in late 2021. The company, which the SEC credited for its cooperation and remedial measures, agreed to pay a $2.125 million civil penalty and voluntarily adopted corrective processes and procedures. The settled action provides strong indications of the measures and controls the agency expects reporting companies to adopt and implement with respect to cybersecurity.Continue Reading SEC Files Settled Charges Based on Alleged Cybersecurity-Related Control Deficiencies

The United States Supreme Court has held that that, in light of the Seventh Amendment’s right to a jury trial, the SEC must pursue enforcement actions seeking civil penalties in a jury trial proceeding in federal court rather than in an action before an administrative law judge. The Court’s 6-3 ruling could have significant consequences for the many SEC enforcement actions now pending in the agency’s administrative tribunals, as well as for the agency’s pursuit of future enforcement actions. The Court’s ruling could also have important implications for other federal agencies’ use of administrative tribunals as well. A copy of the Court’s June 27, 2024, opinion in SEC v. Jarkesy can be found here.Continue Reading Supreme Court Strikes Down SEC’s Use of Administrative Law Judges in Civil Penalty Actions

In a speech last December, as well as in several subsequent statements, SEC Chair Gary Gensler has emphasized the agency’s concerns with companies that are over-hyping their artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities in ways that mislead investors. In March, the agency filed enforcement actions against two investment advisors that allegedly misled investors about the firms’ AI-enabled services.

In the latest example of the agency’s AI-related campaign, earlier this week the agency filed an enforcement action against the CEO and Founder of Joonko Diversity, Inc., an Artificial Intelligence-based employee recruitment startup, alleging among other things that the individual made false AI-related claims about the company’s services. In bringing the action, the agency emphasized the significance of the action’s AI-related allegations. A copy of the agency’s June 11, 2024, press release about the action can be found here. The agency’s complaint in the action can be found here.Continue Reading SEC Files “AI-Washing” Enforcement Action Against AI-Based Start-Up Founder

Largely as a result of an influx of new actions in the fiscal fourth quarter, new SEC accounting and auditing enforcement actions increased in FY 2023 (which ended September 30, 2023) according to a new Cornerstone Research report. The number of new accounting and auditing enforcement actions increased by 22% in FY 2023, compared to the 8% increase in the overall number of enforcement actions during the fiscal year. While the number of accounting and auditing enforcement actions increased in FY 2023, aggregate monetary settlements in accounting and enforcement actions decreased 7% during the fiscal year.Continue Reading SEC Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Actions Increased in FY 2023

The risks and opportunities that AI presents have emerged quickly and may be evolving even faster; the whole AI phenomenon has developed much more quickly than legislators’ and regulators’ ability to respond. Among the many AI effects that regulators and other observers are struggling to assess is the extent of the AI-related litigation potential, including but not limited to the prospects for AI-related corporate and securities litigation.Continue Reading SEC Chair Warns Against “AI Washing”

Priya Cherian Huskins

In a recent post in which I discussed the cyber incident-related enforcement action the SEC brought against the software company SolarWinds, I noted that the defendants named in the action included the company’s Chief Information Security Officer(CISO), adding that the SEC’s naming of the CISO as an enforcement action defendants “is sure to send a shiver down the collective spines of the CISO community.” In the following guest post, Priya Cherian Huskins, Senior Vice President and Partner, Woodruff Sawyer, takes a detailed look at the agency’s action against the SolarWinds CISO, and considers the key liability and insurance implications. A version of this article previously published on Woodruff Sawyer’s D&O Notebook here. I would like to thank Priya for allowing me to publish her article as a guest post on this site. I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this blog’s readers. Please contact me directly if you would like to submit a guest post. Here is Priya’s article.Continue Reading Guest Post: CISO Liability in Focus: SEC Enforcement, Insurance, and [Personal] Risk Mitigation

The reach and scope of the federal securities laws is a concern most obviously relevant to publicly traded companies. However, as I have emphasized previously, private companies are not immune from scrutiny under the federal securities laws. The SEC has in fact an extensive history of pursuing enforcement actions against private companies for alleged federal securities laws violations; one needs to go back no further than the high-profile enforcement action brought against the supposed blood testing company Theranos for an example of this phenomenon in action.

A recent memo from Wiley law firm underscores these points about the exposures of private companies; as the memo’s authors put it, “private entities should be aware that an aggressive SEC can investigate and penalize them (and their executives), even if they are not directly involved in issuing securities.” The law firm’s September 23, 2023, memo, entitled “Think Because You Are a Private Company the SEC Is Not Your Problem? Think Again,” can be found here.Continue Reading Private Companies and SEC Enforcement Actions

On June 30, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to take up a case to consider the legality of the SEC’s use of in-house administrative tribunals, which the agency uses to enforce the federal securities laws. The agency sought Supreme Court consideration of a federal appellate court ruling that held the administrative courts to be unconstitutional. The case could significantly impact the way in which the agency enforces the federal securities laws. The court’s June 30, 2023 order in which the SEC’s petition for a writ of certiorari was granted can be found here.Continue Reading U.S. Supreme Court Takes Up Case Concerning the SEC’s Use of In-House Court