It is a well-established fact that securities class action lawsuits rarely go to trial. In most cases, the lawsuits are either dismissed or settled. However, there has been an interesting recent uptick in the number of securities suits going all the way to a jury verdict. In the latest example of this development, on May 14, 2026, a federal court jury entered a defense verdict following trial in the long-running ExxonMobil securities class action lawsuit. As discussed below, this verdict is the latest of several post-trial verdicts entered in securities suits this year. A May 14, 2026, Law360 article about the verdict can be found here.

Continue Reading Rare Securities Suit Trial Results in Defense Verdict in ExxonMobil Case
Englischer Garten, Munich

The D&O Diary is on assignment in Europe this week, with a first stop in the Bavarian city of Munich. Munich is such a comfortable, walkable place, with rich history, interesting local traditions, and a vibrant arts culture. Munich is one of my favorite places to visit and I was glad to be back again to enjoy the city.

Continue Reading Munich

The recent securities and derivative litigation involving e.l.f. Beauty reflects a familiar D&O liability pattern: a high-growth narrative challenged by operational headwinds, followed by securities litigation and a derivative action. While e.l.f. and its D&Os achieved meaningful success at the motion to dismiss stage, the survival of certain securities claims and a recently filed a derivative complaint in Delaware highlights the potential of prolonged D&O exposure.

Continue Reading Securities Suit Partially Survives; Derivative Action Follows and Prolonged D&O Exposure
Ashwin Ram

Historically, companies have resolved SEC enforcement proceedings by agreeing to pay a fine or penalty, with the payment funds drawn from the corporate treasury. More recently, the agency has signaled an interest in ensuring that enforcement action resolutions involving individual liability, as a means of encouraging both accountability and deterrence. In the following guest post, Ashwin J. Ram, a partner at the Buchalter LLP law firm, examines the SEC’s individual accountability approach and considers the implications. I would like to thank Ashwin for allowing us to publish his article as a guest post on this site. Here is Ashwin’s article.

Continue Reading Guest Post: The SEC Wants Your Officers, Not Just Your Checkbook

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s move to formally rescind its 2024 climate disclosure rule represents a significant turning point in the evolution of ESG-related regulation and the associated D&O risks. According to the federal regulatory tracking website, SEC staff submitted a proposed rule entitled “Rescission of Climate-Related Disclosure Rules” to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs for review on May 4, 2026, formally initiating the withdrawal process. 

Continue Reading SEC Moves to Rescind Climate Disclosure Rule

Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision invalidating tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), litigation risk has entered a new phase. As previously noted on The D&O Diary, early lawsuits seeking recovery focused on companies that passed tariff costs on to consumers. A newly filed class action against Sony Interactive Entertainment suggests a second wave may now be emerging; one targeting companies for allegedly pursuing a “double recovery” by retaining both higher consumer prices and government tariff refunds.

Continue Reading A Second Wave of Tariff Recovery Litigation and Expanding D&O Risk

As Sarah Abrams noted in a post on this site last September, President Trump, in a social media post, proposed eliminating quarterly report for public companies. On May 5, 2026, the SEC acted on the President’s suggestion and proposed a rule that would provide companies currently subject to the agency’s quarterly reporting requirements with the option to instead file interim reports semiannually. It seems likely that optional semiannual reporting will soon be put into effect. The question is whether this is a good idea or will produce the intended benefits, as discussed below.

Continue Reading SEC Proposes Allowing Optional Semiannual Reporting
Shabnam Karim
Simon Lamb

The current conflict in Iran has enormous implications for the global and regional Middle East economy. The conflict also has important insurance implications, including with respect to D&O insurance in the Middle East region. In the following guest post, Shabnam Karim and Simon Lamb examine the ways that the current military, political, and diplomatic circumstances in the region are affecting both corporate risk exposure and the D&O insurance underwriting and claims environment. Shabnam is a partner and Simon is an associate at the Norton Rose Fulbright law firm’s Dubai office. We would like to thank Shabham and Simon for allowing us to publish their article on this site. Here is Shabnam and Simon’s article.

Continue Reading Guest Post: Middle East D&O Claims Exposures in a Time of Tension

As followers of the financial markets know, in recent months, trouble has been brewing in the private credit sector. In at least some cases, the problems in the private credit markets have translated into D&O claims, including both securities class action lawsuits (for example, here) and shareholder derivative lawsuits (here). In the latest example of a private credit-related D&O claim, a shareholder plaintiff has filed a securities class action lawsuit against one of KKR’s private credit ventures, alleging that the firm overstated asset valuations and the effectiveness of its restructuring efforts. A copy of the May 4, 2026, securities class action lawsuit complaint can be found here.

Continue Reading Yet Another Private Credit Firm Hit With Securities Suit

The U.S. Supreme Court’s June 2024 decision in SEC v. Jarkesy continues to generate follow-on litigation, as regulated entities increasingly challenge the constitutionality of administrative enforcement proceedings. As D&O Diary readers will recall, Jarkesy held that when the SEC seeks civil penalties for securities fraud, claims the Court characterized as “legal in nature,” defendants are entitled to a jury trial under the Seventh Amendment. That ruling is now fueling a growing wave of challenges to state administrative regimes, including a pending appeal in Delaware and a closely watched case before the Arizona Supreme Court.

Continue Reading Recent Jarkesy Developments and D&O Impact