Shareholders Derivative Litigation

Subscribe to Shareholders Derivative Litigation via RSS

One of the ways that underlying problems or events can translate into a D&O claim is through a “follow-on” lawsuit alleging the defendant company’s board should be held liable for the underlying problem. In the latest example of this phenomenon, a plaintiff shareholder has filed a derivative lawsuit against the board of Uber, calling the company a “serial compliance offender,” and seeking to hold the board liable for allegedly recurring sexual assault and harassment claims and other alleged legal violations. As discussed below, the new lawsuit illustrates the frequently repeated catch phrase that sooner or later, everything becomes a D&O claim. A copy of the new Uber complaint can be found here.

Continue Reading Derivative Suit Alleges Uber is a “Serial Compliance Offender”

The recent securities and derivative litigation involving e.l.f. Beauty reflects a familiar D&O liability pattern: a high-growth narrative challenged by operational headwinds, followed by securities litigation and a derivative action. While e.l.f. and its D&Os achieved meaningful success at the motion to dismiss stage, the survival of certain securities claims and a recently filed a derivative complaint in Delaware highlights the potential of prolonged D&O exposure.

Continue Reading Securities Suit Partially Survives; Derivative Action Follows and Prolonged D&O Exposure

During my panel, “Shifting Ground: D&O in a Changing World,” at the Professional Underwriting Liability Society (PLUS)’s annual D&O Symposium, I noted the potential for emerging risks stemming from the U.S. government’s recent role as a shareholder in publicly traded companies, including Intel Corp. (Intel).

On March 5, 2026, an Intel investor filed his Verified Stockholder Derivative Complaint in Delaware Court of Chancery against, among others, Intel’s CEO Lip-Bu Tan and U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick (Intel Derivative). Certain exhibits to the Intel Derivative were initially made public, with the lawsuit unsealed days later. The following discusses the Intel Derivative and potential corporate governance challenges that increased government equity ownership may raise for U.S. companies.

Continue Reading Intel Derivative Suit Tests Governance Implications of Government Equity Stakes
Sarah Abrams

Choice of law considerations in litigation can sometimes be outcome determinative. In the following guest post, Sarah Abrams takes a look at a distinctive statutory defense that may be available to derivative litigation defendants when Massachusetts law applies and considers the D&O insurance underwriting implications. I would like to thank Sarah for allowing me to publish her article as a guest post on this site. I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. Please contact me directly if you would like to submit a guest post. Here is Sarah’s article.

Continue Reading Guest Post: Massachusetts as a Safe Harbor from Derivative Suits

It is frequently the case that securities class action lawsuits are accompanied by a parallel shareholder derivative lawsuit involving substantially similar allegations. But what happens to the derivative lawsuits when the related securities class action lawsuit is settled? An August 2025 study from Cornerstone Research analyzes the settlements of these parallel derivative lawsuits during the period 2019 through 2024. The Cornerstone Research report can be found here.

Continue Reading Settlement of Parallel Derivative Actions

In what appears to be one of the largest derivative lawsuit settlements ever, Alphabet, Google’s parent company, has agreed to provide $500 million over ten years to fund the reconstruction of the company’s global compliance structure. The lawsuit and its settlement follow in the wake of extensive federal and state antitrust enforcement activity against the company. The settlement is subject to court approval. A copy of the plaintiffs’ unopposed May 30, 2025, motion for preliminary approval of the settlement can be found here.

Continue Reading Alphabet Settles Antitrust-Related Derivative Suit for $500 Million

Two decisions last week by the New York Court of Appeals – New York’s highest court – may represent the end of plaintiffs’ lawyers’ recent attempts to turn the state’s courts into a focal point for derivative litigation involving non-U.S. companies. Both of the Court’s decisions affirmed the dismissals of derivative suits that had been filed in New York state court against directors of non-U.S. companies — Barclays and Bayer, respectively — asserting claims against them under their respective home countries’ laws. A copy of the court’s May 20, decision in the Barclays case can be found here. A copy of the court’s May 20 decision in the Bayer case can be found here.

Continue Reading NY’s Highest Court Affirms Dismissals of Derivative Suits Involving Non-US Companies

As often happens when companies are hit with securities class action lawsuits, Lululemon, which in August was sued in a securities suit, was hit with a parallel shareholder derivative lawsuit. The derivative suit allegations not only largely track the allegations in the prior securities suit, but the derivative suit complaint expressly refers to the prior securities lawsuit filings. However, there is an unusual twist. In addition to tracking the same allegations as the securities suit, the Lululemon derivative suit complaint contains an entirely new and different set of allegations – and the new set of allegations are interesting in their own right.

The new allegations relate to the Lululemon’s DEI program (or what Lululemon called its IDEA program, standing for Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, and Action). DEI programs have been the recent focus of attention, with, for example, some companies facing litigation for even having a DEA program, and other companies (such as Ford and Harley-Davidson) having to publicly back away from their DEI program in response to political pressure. The allegations in the new Lululemon derivative complaint do not seek to challenge the company for having adopted this kind of program; the allegations instead question the company’s actions for doing too little to combat discrimination and eliminate racial issues at the company. In the context of a changing environment surrounding ESG issues in general, and DEI issues in particular, the new Lululemon lawsuit represents an interesting development, as discussed below. The derivative complaint in the new lawsuit can be found here.

Continue Reading Lululemon Hit with Derivative Suit for Allegedly Ineffective DEI Program

In what is one of the largest settlements in a breach of the duty of oversight lawsuit, the parties to the Walmart Opioid-Related Shareholder Derivative lawsuit have agreed to settle the case for $123 million. The settlement is also one of the largest-ever derivative lawsuit settlements. As discussed below, the Walmart settlement is the latest in a series of jumbo settlements in opioid-related breach of the duty of oversight claims. The settlement is subject to court approval. A copy of the parties’ October 13, 2024, Stipulation of Settlement can be found here.

Continue Reading Walmart Opioid-Related Duty of Oversight Derivative Suit Settled for $123 Million

As I have noted in several recent posts (most recently here), over the last several months Delaware’s Chancery Court has appeared increasingly skeptical of breach of the duty over oversight claims, seemingly underscoring the oft-stated proposition that so-called Caremark claims are among the most difficult to sustain. However, a recent decision out of the Northern District of California, applying Delaware law but arguably ruling contrary to the recent Delaware Chancery Court trends, sustained at least some of the breach of the duty of oversight claims alleged against Wells Fargo board of director in connection with discriminatory lending allegations against the company. As discussed in detail below, the Wells Fargo decision could have interesting implications for the evolving body of duty of oversight case law.

Continue Reading Breach of the Duty of Oversight Claims Against Wells Fargo’s Board Sustained in Part