Photo of Kevin LaCroix

Kevin LaCroix

Subscribe to Kevin LaCroix's Posts

Kevin M. LaCroix is an attorney and Executive Vice President, RT ProExec, a division of RT Specialty. RT ProExec is an insurance intermediary focused exclusively on management liability issues.

Follow:Read more about Kevin LaCroixKevin's Linkedin ProfileKevin's Twitter Profile
Justice Sonia Sotomayor

On April 12, 2023, in a short, unanimous opinion written by Justice Sonja Sotomayor, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a failure to disclose information required under Item 303 of Regulation S-K is, standing alone, not an actionable omission under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The Supreme Court said that in the absence of affirmative statement that is rendered misleading by the omission, an Item 303 violation alone is not sufficient to state a claim under Rule 10b-5. As the Supreme Court opinion put it in summarizing its decision, “pure omissions are not actionable under Rule 10b–5.” The Court’s opinion in Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. Moab Partners L.P. can be found here.

Continue Reading U.S. Supreme Court: Item 303 Omissions Alone Not Actionable
Frankfurt

The D&O Diary is on assignment in Europe this week, with the first stop in Frankfurt, the German financial capital. The spring weather in Frankfurt was mild and pleasant while I was there, though I was in Frankfurt all too briefly.

The purpose of my visit to Frankfurt was to participate in the DRRT…

Financially distressed companies often can only obtain D&O insurance coverage on a policy with a bankruptcy or insolvency exclusion precluding coverage for bankruptcy-related claims. The enforcement of these exclusions in the wake of a subsequent bankruptcy can produce harsh results, and insureds often argue that the exclusion does not apply or even that the exclusion…

From time to time, I am asked to speak directly to corporate boards of directors. I find these opportunities endlessly fascinating. Among other things, I learn so much from the directors’ questions. One frequently recurring question I get is:  what can directors do to avoid litigation or to be in a position better defend themselves if they are sued. The first thing I always talk about when asked these kinds of question is the importance of board minutes. Because this is one of my go-to talking points when I meet with boards, I was particularly pleased to see the recent post on the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance blog written by Leo E. Strine, Jr., the former Delaware Supreme Court Chief Justice and Chancellor, in which Strine highlights the importance of board minutes in corporate litigation. Strine’s comments are essential reading for anyone concerned with the liabilities of corporate directors. Strine’s April 4, 2024 article can be found here.

Continue Reading The Importance of Board Minutes

It is frequently the case that lawsuits are preceded by a letter in which a prospective litigant identifies a grievance and makes various kinds of threats or demands. A perennial question is whether this type of pre-suit demand letter constitutes a “claim” within the meaning of a claims-made liability insurance policy. The Second Circuit, applying New York law, recently affirmed a district court ruling holding that a pre-suit demand letter, received before the applicable policy’s coverage inception date, was a claim within the meaning of the policy. Because the claim was first made prior to the inception of coverage, the court held that there was no coverage for the subsequently filed lawsuit. The Court’s ruling provides an interesting take on this frequently recurring issue.

Continue Reading When Is a Pre-Suit Demand Letter a Claim?

The number of securities class action lawsuit filings involving accounting allegations increased in 2023 compared to 2022, but the 2023 accounting-related filings remained below the long-term annual average number of such filings, according to the latest annual report from Cornerstone Research. The number of accounting-related settlements decreased during 2023, as did the median settlement value, though the aggregate and average value of accounting related settlements increased. The Cornerstone Research Report, which is entitled “Accounting Class Action Filings and Settlements: 2023 Review and Analysis,” can be found here. Cornerstone Research’s April 3, 2024, press release about the report can be found here.

Continue Reading Cornerstone Research: Accounting-Related Securities Suit Filings Increased in 2023

Readers know that since the initial coronavirus-related outbreak in the U.S. in March 2020, I have been tracking the COVID-related securities suit filings. Even though the four-year mark since the initial outbreak recently passed, and even though it has now been a considerable amount of time since businesses fully reopened from government shutdowns, COVID-related securities suits continue to be filed. Earlier this week, a plaintiff shareholder filed a securities lawsuit against health services management company Agilon Health, in which the plaintiff alleged that the company had understated the impact of the COVID-19 on patient utilization rates, thereby overstating key financial metrics. A copy of the April 2, 2024, complaint can be found here.

Continue Reading Health Services Management Company Hit with COVID-19 Related Securities Suit

The number of securities class action lawsuits filed against life sciences companies in 2023 remained steady compared to 2022, as suits against life sciences companies represented almost one in five of the securities class action lawsuits filed during the year, according to a new report from the Dechert law firm. The report, entitled “Dechert Survey: Developments in Securities Fraud Class Actions Against U.S. Life Sciences Companies: 2023 Edition,” states that there were a total of 43 securities suits filed against life sciences companies in 2023, the same number as were filed in 2022. The Dechert law firm’s March 27, 2024 press release, which links to the full report,  can be found here.

Continue Reading Life Sciences Companies Remained Frequent Securities Suit Targets in 2023

In an interesting March 18, 2024, decision, a California federal district court, applying California law, has held that insurance coverage may be available under the D&O liability endorsement to a community association policy for a claim arising from funds misdirected due to fraudulent payment instructions in a spoofed email. The court held that because the non-payment happened due to the association’s treasurer’s alleged negligence, the vendor’s claim for non-payment arose out of “wrongful acts” of the treasurer, and therefore the vendor’s claim triggered coverage. The court’s decision raises some interesting possibilities about the potential for D&O insurance coverage for these kinds of misdirected payment claims, and it also raises interesting possibilities about potential coverage for breach of contract claims.

Continue Reading Claim for Nonpayment Due to Payment Instruction Fraud Potentially Covered Under D&O Policy

As ESG-related litigation has developed, one definitive trend has been the emergence of litigation involving allegations of “greenwashing” – that is, claims alleging that companies overstated their ESG credentials in order to win business, attract customers, or score virtue points. To date, the greenwashing claims have emerged primarily in the U.S. and Europe. Now, Australia is getting into the act, as the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has brought and won its first greenwashing civil penalty action. As discussed below, the action involved claims that Vanguard’s Australian affiliate made misleading statements about its ESG-sorting processes for one of its index funds.

Continue Reading Australian Regulator Wins First Greenwashing Enforcement Action