Trump administration

Subscribe to Trump administration via RSS

In prior posts (most recently here), I have noted the risk to companies in the current global trade environment of governmental enforcement actions relating to the collection and payment of tariffs. Indeed, in a May 12, 2025, memo, Assistant Attorney General Matthew Galeotti identified “trade and customs fraud, including tariff evasion” as the Department of Justice’s number two corporate criminal enforcement priority.

In the latest sign that the Trump administration is ready to aggressively deploy its enforcement tools to ensure compliance with tariffs and other trade goals, the U.S. government has filed a complaint in intervention in a pending qui tam action against a South Carolina furniture company, alleging that the company used false documentation to underreport the price of furniture the company imported from China, resulting in tariff underpayment. The new case underscores the fact that as the current Trump rolls out and enforces its sweeping tariff program, companies will face significant scrutiny and potential claims risk.Continue Reading Trump Administration Brings Tariff Evasion Claim

In numerous public statements, Trump Administration officials have said the Administration intends to use the False Claims Act (FCA) to enforce certain policy priorities. For example, in connection with statements concerning the Administration’s intent to combat “illegal DEI,” officials have declared that corporate DEI policies or practices violating anti-discrimination laws could trigger FCA liability.  There are a number of levels on which potential FCA liability represents a serious corporate liability risk, not least because of the possibility of whistleblowers (including company employees or competitors) launching FCA whistleblower claims. In addition, as discussed below, a recent Southern District of New York ruling highlights how potentially massive FCA liability can be.Continue Reading More About the Trump Administration and Potential False Claims Act Liability

The Trump administration has made it clear that combatting “illegal DEI” is a priority. Indeed, on the first full day after his inauguration, President Trump issued an executive order targeting “Illegal DEI” in the private sector. In early February, Attorney General Pam Bondi issued a memo directing the U.S. Department of Justice’s positions with respect to DEI. Now, the newly appointed head of the Department of Justice’s Civil Division has issued a separate memo identifying the division’s priorities, with DEI topics given precedence, clearly marking DEI as a DOJ Civil Division enforcement authority, with important implications for companies.   Continue Reading Department of Justice Civil Division Targets “Illegal DEI”

Sarah Abrams

As I have noted in previous post on this site (most recently here), the Trump Administration’s tariff and trade policies not only pose potential operating and financial challenges to many businesses, but they may also present companies with corporate liability exposures as well. In the following guest post, Sarah Abrams, Head of Claims Baleen Specialty, a division of Bowhead Specialty, considers the liability risks that companies may face under the current tariff regime. I would like to thank Sarah for allowing me to publish her article as a guest post on this site. I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. Please contact me directly if you would like to submit a guest post. Here is Sarah’s article.Continue Reading Guest Post: Whiplash

Michael W. Peregrine
Ashley Hoff

On May 12, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) Criminal Division announced significant changes in its policies on investigating and prosecuting white collar crime. In its memo announcing the new policies, and in subsequent statements, the agency signaled its intent to refine enforcement priorities, encourage self-disclosure, and increase efficiency in investigations. In the following guest post, Michael W. Peregrine and Ashley Hoff of the McDermott Will & Emery law firm review the agency’s new policies and consider the policies’ potential director and officer liability implications. I would like to thank Michael and Ashley for allowing me to publish their article on this site. I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. Please contact me directly if you would like to submit a guest post. Here is Michael and Ashley’s article.Continue Reading Guest Post: New DOJ White Collar Enforcement Policy Pressures Caremark Obligations

As the Trump administration has launched, postponed, reinstated, and negotiated its evolving tariff policies, companies have been forced to deal with a changing and unpredictable business environment. As I have previously discussed, these changing circumstances not only have implications for companies’ business operations and financial results, they also have implications for companies’ potential liability exposures as well. One important area of tariff-related potential liability has to do with companies’ disclosures – that is, what the companies are saying about the impact of the tariffs on their operations and financial results.Continue Reading Tariffs and Disclosures: Corporate Risks in a Global Trade War

Sarah Abrams

In the following guest post, Sarah Abrams, Head of Claims Baleen Specialty, a division of Bowhead Specialty, takes a look at important questions that are arising in litigation challenging Trump administration acts with regard to “DEI” — including one judge’s question about what exactly DEI is. The administration’s answer to the question could have important implications for companies, as discussed below. I would like to thank Sarah for allowing me to publish her article as a guest post on this site. I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. Please contact me directly if you would like to submit a guest post. Here is Sarah’s article. Continue Reading Guest Post: What is DEI?

Among the many executive orders launched at the outset of the current Trump administration was the January 23, 2025 Executive Order that declared the administration’s commitment to maintaining the U.S. at the “forefront of artificial intelligence (AI) innovation.” The Executive Order set out the administration’s commitment to removing policies and directives that “act as barriers to American AI innovation.”

The Executive Order meant a variety of things when it referred to removing barriers, and the statement does at least raise the question about what the administration’s – and in particular, the SEC’s – enforcement approach to AI will be, if the goal is to remove barriers. As discussed below, there are signs to suggest that the administration will continue to monitor and address AI-related misrepresentations, notwithstanding its commitment to removing barriers to AI innovation.  Continue Reading What About AI-Related Enforcement Under the Trump Administration?

Burkhard Fassbach

As this blog’s readers know, DEI as a topic has proven to be a high priority under the new Trump administration. The administration’s approach to DEI is important not only for domestic U.S. companies, but also for multinational companies with U.S. subsidiaries. In the following guest post, Burkhard Fassbach examines the DEI-related issues for multinational companies. Burkhard is a D&O lawyer in private practice in Germany. I would like to thank Burkhard for allowing me to publish his article as a guest post on this site. I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. Please contact me directly if you would like to submit a guest post. Here is Burkhard’s article.Continue Reading Guest Post: What Multinational Corporations Should Know About DEI Risks in the US

Even before the start of the new Trump administration, corporate DEI initiatives faced increasing scrutiny. With the new administration, DEI initiatives face even greater scrutiny. Following Trump’s January inauguration, the President and the Attorney General declared that the new administration intends to target what they have called “illegal DEI.” The administration’s approach creates regulatory and enforcement risks for companies and their executives with respect to DEI issues. And as detailed in a recent law firm memo, these developments could also give rise to increased corporate and securities litigation risks as well, as discussed below. The Winston and Strawn law firm’s April 28, 2025, memo entitled “Securities Litigation Risk in the Evolving DEI Landscape” can be found here.Continue Reading Corporate and Securities Litigation Risk in the New DEI Environment