False Claims Act

Subscribe to False Claims Act via RSS

The Trump Administration has already shown that it intends to use the False Claims Act (FCA) as one of the primary tools in its arsenal to enforce its policy priorities. For example, as discussed in prior posts on this site (most recently here), the administration is actively using the FCA to enforce its tariff policies. In the latest demonstration that the FCA may now be the administration’s preferred enforcement tool, the administration appears to be actively gearing up to use the FCA as a primary weapon in its campaign against “illegal DEI,” in an apparent use of the FCA commentators agree would be, at a minimum, “novel.” The administration’s use of the FCA for these purposes could pose significant challenges for companies — and their insurers.Continue Reading The Trump Administration Use of the False Claims Act in Anti-DEI Campaign

Sarah Abrams

The Trump administration has already demonstrated that it intends to actively pursue tariff enforcement, as discussed in prior posts on this site (most recently here). One of the enforcement tools the administration is using is the False Claims Act. In the following post, Sarah Abrams, Head of Claims Baleen Specialty, a division of Bowhead Specialty, takes a look at the ways the administration is using the False Claims Act as an enforcement tool, in the context of two recent enforcement actions. My thanks to Sarah for allowing me to publish her article as a guest post on this site. Here is Sarah’s article.Continue Reading Guest Post: False Claims Act Tariff Enforcement

In my recent roundup of the top current stories in the world of D&O, I noted the increasing importance of geopolitical issues as a source of D&O claims risk. Among the factors supporting this trend is the rising relevance of cross-border enforcement initiatives, which in many instances had led to D&O claims. In the latest sign of the importance of cross-border enforcement issues, the SEC has announced the formation of a cross-border task force to “identify and combat cross-border fraud harming U.S. investors.” The SEC’s September 5, 2025, press release about the task force can be found here.  A September 10, 2025, post on TheCorporateCounsel.net blog about the new task force’s formation can be found here.Continue Reading SEC Forms Task Force to Combat Cross-Border Fraud

Regular readers undoubtedly have noticed that I have been writing a lot lately about the False Claims Act (FCA). That is because the Trump Administration has decided to deploy the FCA as one of its principal legal tools to enforce and advance its policy objectives. Insurers wondering what the administration’s enforcement approach may mean for their claims portfolios may want to take a look at the securities class action lawsuit recently filed against online insurance broker SelectQuote. The company, whom the DOJ sued in May in a False Claims Act suit alleging the company received “illegal kickbacks” from insurers, has now been hit with a follow-on securities suit relating to the FCA allegations. As discussed below, the new follow-on lawsuit suggests that D&O insurers will want to consider the implications of the administration’s active deployment of the FCA as an enforcement tool. A copy of the August 11, 2025, lawsuit against SelectQuote can be found here.Continue Reading False Claims Act Defendant Hit with Follow-On Securities Suit        

Well-advised companies know that among their key corporate risks are potential liability exposures arising from or related to cybersecurity. A recent U.S. Department of Justice enforcement action highlights the fact that corporate cybersecurity risk may take a number of forms, including, as was the case in the recent matter, potential False Claims Act (FCA) liability for cybersecurity vulnerabilities in products sold to the federal government. The fact that the recent case, involving life sciences company Illumina, settled for $9.8 million, underscores the seriousness of this cybersecurity-related liability FCA exposure.Continue Reading Cybersecurity and False Claims Act Liability Exposure

In prior posts (most recently here), I have noted the risk to companies in the current global trade environment of governmental enforcement actions relating to the collection and payment of tariffs. Indeed, in a May 12, 2025, memo, Assistant Attorney General Matthew Galeotti identified “trade and customs fraud, including tariff evasion” as the Department of Justice’s number two corporate criminal enforcement priority.

In the latest sign that the Trump administration is ready to aggressively deploy its enforcement tools to ensure compliance with tariffs and other trade goals, the U.S. government has filed a complaint in intervention in a pending qui tam action against a South Carolina furniture company, alleging that the company used false documentation to underreport the price of furniture the company imported from China, resulting in tariff underpayment. The new case underscores the fact that as the current Trump rolls out and enforces its sweeping tariff program, companies will face significant scrutiny and potential claims risk.Continue Reading Trump Administration Brings Tariff Evasion Claim

In numerous public statements, Trump Administration officials have said the Administration intends to use the False Claims Act (FCA) to enforce certain policy priorities. For example, in connection with statements concerning the Administration’s intent to combat “illegal DEI,” officials have declared that corporate DEI policies or practices violating anti-discrimination laws could trigger FCA liability.  There are a number of levels on which potential FCA liability represents a serious corporate liability risk, not least because of the possibility of whistleblowers (including company employees or competitors) launching FCA whistleblower claims. In addition, as discussed below, a recent Southern District of New York ruling highlights how potentially massive FCA liability can be.Continue Reading More About the Trump Administration and Potential False Claims Act Liability

The Trump administration has made it clear that combatting “illegal DEI” is a priority. Indeed, on the first full day after his inauguration, President Trump issued an executive order targeting “Illegal DEI” in the private sector. In early February, Attorney General Pam Bondi issued a memo directing the U.S. Department of Justice’s positions with respect to DEI. Now, the newly appointed head of the Department of Justice’s Civil Division has issued a separate memo identifying the division’s priorities, with DEI topics given precedence, clearly marking DEI as a DOJ Civil Division enforcement authority, with important implications for companies.   Continue Reading Department of Justice Civil Division Targets “Illegal DEI”

Burkhard Fassbach

As this blog’s readers know, DEI as a topic has proven to be a high priority under the new Trump administration. The administration’s approach to DEI is important not only for domestic U.S. companies, but also for multinational companies with U.S. subsidiaries. In the following guest post, Burkhard Fassbach examines the DEI-related issues for multinational companies. Burkhard is a D&O lawyer in private practice in Germany. I would like to thank Burkhard for allowing me to publish his article as a guest post on this site. I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. Please contact me directly if you would like to submit a guest post. Here is Burkhard’s article.Continue Reading Guest Post: What Multinational Corporations Should Know About DEI Risks in the US

Earlier this month, when President Trump announced comprehensive tariffs, I speculated about whether or not the administration’s new tariff policy could create an environment that could lead to legal claims against some companies and their directors and offices. While I anticipated (and continue to anticipate) the possibility that there will be tariff-related D&O claims, one possibility I had not considered is the prospect that the new U.S. tariff regime could lead to increased number of tariff-related False Claims Act claims.

In an interesting April 16, 2025, memo, the Nixon Peabody law firm explains how “evasion of tariff requirements, including via false representation of countries of origin and undervaluation or misclassification of goods, creates the risk of substantial liability under the False Claims Act.” The law firm’s memo can be found here. (Hat Tip: John Jenkins of The CorporateCounsel.net Blog, who linked to the law firm memo in his April 23, 2025, post on the blog.)Continue Reading Trump’s Tariffs and the Risk of False Claims Act Liability