antitrust

Subscribe to antitrust via RSS
Sarah Abrams

Earlier this year, the parties to the consolidated antitrust litigation involving college athletes name, image, and likeness rights (NIL) entered a settlement. The settlement is generally referred to as the “House Settlement.” In the time since the settlement, there have been further developments raising questions about the settlement. Among those developments is that certain college athletes have raised objections to the settlement. In the following guest post, Sarah Abrams takes a look at the athletes’ objections and considers their management liability implications. I would like to thank Sarah for allowing me to publish her article as a guest post on this site. I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. Please contact me directly if you would like to submit a guest post. Here is Sarah’s article.Continue Reading Guest Post: Post-House Settlement Objection Liability

Sarah Abrams

In the following guest post, Sarah Abrams, Head of Claims Baleen Specialty, a division of Bowhead Specialty, takes a look at the D&O liability risks that can emerge when a company bundles products or services, as well as the costs that can be involved in defending companies from allegations of anticompetitive conduct. I would like to thank Sarah for allowing me to publish her article as a guest post on this site. I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. Please contact me directly if you would like to submit a guest post. Here is Sarah’s article.Continue Reading Guest Post: Tied to a Birkin

Sarah Abrams

I am sure that many readers followed with interest the recent litigation brought by college athletes against the NCAA and the top athletic conferences in which the athletes alleged that the defendants conspired to suppress athletes’ compensation. The lawsuit ended in a blockbuster settlement that may reshape the fundamental economics of college sports. Now, as discussed in the following guest post from Sarah Abrams, a group of professional tennis players, have filed a lawsuit in which they, too, allege their compensation has been suppressed, in this case by a “tennis cartel.” Sarah, who is Head of Claims Baleen Specialty, a division of Bowhead Specialty, takes a look at the new lawsuit and considers the D&O insurance implications. I would like to thank Sarah for allowing me to publish her article as a guest post on this site. I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. Please contact me directly if you would like to submit a guest post. Here is Sarah’s article.Continue Reading Guest Post: Antitrust is Love

In what appears to be one of the largest derivative lawsuit settlements ever, Alphabet, Google’s parent company, has agreed to provide $500 million over ten years to fund the reconstruction of the company’s global compliance structure. The lawsuit and its settlement follow in the wake of extensive federal and state antitrust enforcement activity against the company. The settlement is subject to court approval. A copy of the plaintiffs’ unopposed May 30, 2025, motion for preliminary approval of the settlement can be found here.Continue Reading Alphabet Settles Antitrust-Related Derivative Suit for $500 Million

As I have previously noted on this site (for example, here), a long-standing and frequently recurring litigation pattern has been the filing of a corporate or securities lawsuit in the wake of an antitrust enforcement action. In the latest example of this pattern, a plaintiff shareholder has alleged that Atkore, a PVC pipe manufacturer, misled investors by failing to disclose that its product pricing was being propped up by an alleged scheme with its competitors to fix prices. The securities suit filing follows a prior civil antitrust action against the company and its competitors. The securities suit, which in addition to representing an example of antitrust follow-on securities litigation, is also an example of a lawsuit arising out of a company’s post-COVID business operations. A copy of the February 21, 2025, complaint can be found here.Continue Reading Antitrust Allegations Lead to Securities Suit Against PVC Pipe Company

In prior posts, I have noted the phenomenon of securities class action lawsuit filings following in the wake of antitrust enforcement actions (most recently here). A new securities lawsuit filed just before year-end presents an interesting new variation on this sequence. The new lawsuit, filed against both Capri Holdings Limited and Tapestry, Inc., two high-fashion firms, and certain of their executives, relates back to an enforcement action the FTC filed against the firms to block their plans to merge. As discussed below, the lawsuit involves several interesting features. A copy of the plaintiff’s December 23, 2024, complaint can be found here.Continue Reading Securities Suit Follows After Antitrust Ruling Bars Firms’ Merger Plans

As I have previously noted on this site (for example, here), a long-standing and frequently recurring litigation pattern has been the filing of a corporate or securities lawsuit in the wake of an antitrust enforcement action. In the latest example of this pattern, the card payment processing company Visa has been hit with a securities class action lawsuit after the DOJ launched an antitrust enforcement action against the company in September. There are several interesting features to this new lawsuit, as discussed below. The November 20, 2024, complaint against Visa can be found here.Continue Reading Antitrust Enforcement Action Against VISA Leads to Follow-On Securities Suit

Long-time readers know that a litigation phenomenon on which I have frequently commented is the filing of securities class action lawsuits in the wake of antitrust enforcement actions. These follow-on civil actions represent something of a translation of an antitrust matter into a securities lawsuit. In the latest example of this phenomenon, a plaintiff shareholder has filed a securities suit against the concert company Live Nation following news reports of an imminent U.S. Department of Justice antitrust lawsuit against the company and its ticketing service Ticketmaster relating to allegations that the concert company pressures clients to use the ticketing service. The new lawsuit raises a number of interesting issues, as discussed below. A copy of the August 4, 2023 complaint can be found here.Continue Reading Antitrust Enforcement Leads to Follow-On Securities Suit Against Live Nation

In the following guest post, Brian Baney, Senior Vice President, Head of Management and Professional Liability Claims, Ascot Group, Peter Trochev, Senior Vice President, Financial Institutions, Ascot Group, Elan Kandel, Member, Bailey Cavalieri LLC and James Talbert, Associate, Bailey Cavalieri LLC, survey the current risk environment for private equity firms. I would like to thank the authors for allowing me to publish their article as a guest post on this site. I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this blog’s readers Please contact me directly if you would like to submit a guest post. Here is the author’s article.Continue Reading Guest Post: The State of Private Equity in 2023: Is a Maelstrom on the Horizon?  

As I noted in recent posts (for example, here), an anti-ESG backlash has been forming. The backlash has already taken a variety of forms, including anti-ESG legislation and anti-ESG litigation. Now, in what one media source called a “new front in a campaign against companies” related to ESG activities, a group of five Republican senators has sent letters to 51 large U.S. law firms warning the firms that the Senators plan to use their congressional oversight powers “to scrutinize the institutionalized antitrust violations being committed in the name of ESG.” The Senators’ letter campaign is described in a November 4, 2022 Reuters article (here). The Senators’ November 3, 2022 letters to the law firms can be found here.
Continue Reading Senators Warn Law Firms Concerning ESG-Related Advice