Photo of Kevin LaCroix

Kevin LaCroix

Subscribe to Kevin LaCroix's Posts

Kevin M. LaCroix is an attorney and Executive Vice President, RT ProExec, a division of RT Specialty. RT ProExec is an insurance intermediary focused exclusively on management liability issues.

Follow:Read more about Kevin LaCroixKevin's Linkedin ProfileKevin's Twitter Profile

ESG has been and remains a serious concern for corporate executives. However, the role that it plays as a part of the corporate risk equation has changed. From a time not that long ago where companies were under pressure to establish their ESG credentials and promote ESG objectives, many companies now face an opposite politically charged backlash, that, among other things, has pushed some companies to walk back their ESG-related initiatives. For example, just this past week Walmart became the latest company to drop its DEI program in response to right-wing pressure, joining similar moves by Ford, Harley-Davidson, and Lowe’s, among others.  

In the latest example of ways that politically-motivated activists are attempting to turn companies’ ESG initiatives against them, last Wednesday a groups of eleven states’ attorneys general led by Texas AG Ken Paxton filed a federal court suit against Blackrock, Vanguard, and State Street, alleging that the three institutional investors conspired to restrict the availability of coal, to the alleged detriment of consumers, and in alleged violation of federal and state antitrust laws. A copy of the Texas AG’s November 27, 2024, press release about the lawsuit can be found here. A copy of the state AGs’ complaint can be found here.Continue Reading State AGs File ESG-Related Antitrust Suit Against Big Institutional Investors

Umesh Pratapa

In the following guest post, Umesh Pratapa takes a look at environmental liability risks under Indian law and consider the D&O insurance implications. Umesh is the Author of the handbook on D&O liability insurance published by Institute of Directors (IOD), India, and Consultant – liability insurance. I would like to thank Umesh for allowing me to publish his article on this site. I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to the site’s readers. Please contact me directly if you would like to submit a guest post. Here is Umesh’s article.

*************************************Continue Reading Guest Post: India: Environmental Litigation Risks – D&O Liability Insurance

Is a company’s action against a corporate executive to recover the costs of defense the company advanced on his behalf “restitutionary” in nature and are the amounts involved therefore precluded from coverage under the D&O insurance policy’s definition of Loss? In an opinion that undoubtedly will gladden the hearts of policyholder-side advocates, a California appellate court held that it is not. As discussed below, there are a number of interesting features to the court’s opinion. The California Court of Appeals’ November 12, 2024 opinion can be found here.Continue Reading CA Court: Suit to Recover Executive’s Defense Fees not “Restitutionary”

As often happens when companies are hit with securities class action lawsuits, Lululemon, which in August was sued in a securities suit, was hit with a parallel shareholder derivative lawsuit. The derivative suit allegations not only largely track the allegations in the prior securities suit, but the derivative suit complaint expressly refers to the prior securities lawsuit filings. However, there is an unusual twist. In addition to tracking the same allegations as the securities suit, the Lululemon derivative suit complaint contains an entirely new and different set of allegations – and the new set of allegations are interesting in their own right.

The new allegations relate to the Lululemon’s DEI program (or what Lululemon called its IDEA program, standing for Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, and Action). DEI programs have been the recent focus of attention, with, for example, some companies facing litigation for even having a DEA program, and other companies (such as Ford and Harley-Davidson) having to publicly back away from their DEI program in response to political pressure. The allegations in the new Lululemon derivative complaint do not seek to challenge the company for having adopted this kind of program; the allegations instead question the company’s actions for doing too little to combat discrimination and eliminate racial issues at the company. In the context of a changing environment surrounding ESG issues in general, and DEI issues in particular, the new Lululemon lawsuit represents an interesting development, as discussed below. The derivative complaint in the new lawsuit can be found here.Continue Reading Lululemon Hit with Derivative Suit for Allegedly Ineffective DEI Program

The current Supreme Court term promised to be an interesting one from a securities law standpoint, as the Court had agreed to take up two cases dealing with key securities class action litigation issues. One of those cases is the securities case involving the Facebook/Cambridge Analytica’s user data scandal. The Facebook case would have required the Court to address an important and recurring disclosure related issue. However, on November 22, 2024, the Court issued a single-line order stating that “the writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted,” meaning that the Supreme Court’s consideration of the Facebook case will now not go forward, and the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in the case, in which the appellate court reversed in part the district court’s dismissal of the case, will now stand. A copy of the Supreme Court’s November 22, 2024, order can be found here.Continue Reading U.S. Supreme Court Dismisses Facebook Case, Saying Writ Improvidently Granted

As I have previously noted on this site (for example, here), a long-standing and frequently recurring litigation pattern has been the filing of a corporate or securities lawsuit in the wake of an antitrust enforcement action. In the latest example of this pattern, the card payment processing company Visa has been hit with a securities class action lawsuit after the DOJ launched an antitrust enforcement action against the company in September. There are several interesting features to this new lawsuit, as discussed below. The November 20, 2024, complaint against Visa can be found here.Continue Reading Antitrust Enforcement Action Against VISA Leads to Follow-On Securities Suit

Michael W. Peregrine
Ashley Hoff

There is no doubt that the upcoming change in Presidential administration will have important implications across a wide range of issue. In some cases, the change will present unique challenges for corporate boards. As boards work their way through these changes and challenges, they will also face an altered corporate compliance oversight environment. In the following guest post, Michael W. Peregrine and Ashley Hoff of the McDermott Will & Emery LLP law firm consider the implications of this changed environment for corporate boards. I would like to thank Michael and Ashley for allowing me to publish their article as a guest post on this site. I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. Please contact me directly if you would like to submit a guest post. Here is the author’s article.Continue Reading Guest Post: The Board’s Post-Election Oversight of Corporate Compliance

Alex Hopkins

In a guest post published on this site in October 2023 (here), Jane Njavro of Woodruff Sawyer took a look at the perennial issues surrounding the structure of D&O insurance for foreign subsidiaries of domestic U.S. companies. In the following guest post, Alex Hopkins, AVP & Counsel, Travelers Bond & Specialty Insurance, takes a further look at these issues and reviews the compliance, coverage, and claims management considerations involved. I would like to thank Alex for allowing me to publish his article on this site. I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. Please contact me directly if you would like to submit a guest post. Here is Alex’s article.Continue Reading Guest Post: Managing D&O Compliance, Coverage, and Claims Beyond U.S. Borders

One of the more interesting developments in the securities litigation arena over the past several years has been the continuing influx of pandemic-related securities class action lawsuit filings. Here we are now approaching what will be the sixth year since the initial outbreak of COVID-19 in the U.S. and yet the pandemic-related suits are continuing to come in. In the latest example, last week a shareholder plaintiff filed a securities class action lawsuit against the toy company Hasbro, alleging that the company misled investors by claiming that the level of inventory it built up in response to pandemic lockdown-related consumer demand was appropriate, only to later announce it would have to incur substantial inventory reduction costs. A copy of the November 13, 2024, complaint against Hasbro can be found here.Continue Reading Toy Company Hit with Pandemic-Related Securities Suit

This past week, The D&O Diary was on assignment in Chicago to attend the 2024 PLUS Conference. Hard to believe, but this year’s version was the 37th installment in the annual series. It was as well-attended and well-organized as always. The event was held at the Sheraton Grand Hotel Riverwalk, right on the Chicago River. Chicago is one of my favorite places to visit and it was great to be back again. It was also great to see so many old friends and to make some new friends as well, as reflected in the pictures below. Continue Reading Chicago PLUS Conference 2024