Artificial Intelligence

Subscribe to Artificial Intelligence via RSS
Sarah Abrams

Workplace utilization of artificial intelligence-enhanced tools, including AI-based Large Language Models, is becoming pervasive. But could employee use of AI tools potentially lead to executive liability? That is the question addressed in this guest post, from Sarah Abrams, Head of Claims Baleen Specialty, a division of Bowhead Specialty. I would like to thank Sarah for allowing me to publish her article as a guest post on this site. I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. Please contact me directly if you would like to submit a guest post. Here is Sarah’s article.

Continue Reading Guest Post: Does Employee Use of AI at Work Create Executive Risk?

The recent meteoric rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has not only upended many traditional business processes and set financial markets ablaze, but it has also captured the attention of the world’s political leadership. The leaders’ response includes not only excitement about AI’s impressive potential, but also concerns about the legitimate risks that AI presents. At the recent Artificial Intelligence Action Summit, held in Paris on February 10 and 11, 2025, many event participants advanced the view that for AI to realize its full potential, a regulatory “light touch” is required. While this restrained regulatory perspective has many advocates, the concerns associated with AI will still have to be addressed one way or another – which underscores the question about what the appropriate approach to AI regulation should be.

Continue Reading AI-Related Risk and Regulation

Earlier this week, a plaintiff shareholder filed a securities class action lawsuit against ad-buying platform The Trade Desk after the company announced revenues lower than anticipated due to delays in the rollout of the company’s AI-based forecasting tool. As discussed below, this new lawsuit arguably represents a potential new direction in AI-related securities lawsuits. A copy of the February 19, 2025, lawsuit can be found here.

Continue Reading Ad Platform Hit with Securities Suit for Alleged Failure to Disclose AI Risk

The global economy is still adapting to the advent of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) era. It remains unclear what AI ultimately will mean for economies and businesses, and many businesses are struggling to adjust in real time. The firms experiencing these struggles also include companies in the business of providing AI products and services. In many cases, these companies’ struggles can translate into securities litigation. A lawsuit filed earlier this week against Netherland-domiciled AI services company Elastic illustrates the ways securities litigation can arise from AI companies’ business struggles. A copy of the February 11, 2025, complaint filed against Elastic can be found here.

Continue Reading AI Search Company Hit with Securities Suit   

In my recent year-end wrap up, I noted that one of last year’s top stories was the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) as a source of corporate and securities litigation risk. Among the evidence reflecting the rise of AI as a source of risk was the onset of securities class action litigation containing AI-related allegations. Last week, in a new lawsuit filing showing that AI-related litigation risks are continuing, a plaintiff shareholder filed a securities suit against a Canadian technology services company whose revenues declined and whose margins shrunk as the company shifted its services to an AI-based model. A copy of the January 30, 2025, complaint against Telus International (CDA) Inc. can be found here.

Continue Reading Tech Company Hit with Securities Suit Alleging AI-Related Omissions

In what may be the SEC’s first AI-washing enforcement action against a reporting company, on January 14, 2025, the agency brought a settled enforcement action against Presto Automation, a restaurant services technology company, based on the company’s alleged misrepresentations “regarding critical aspects of its flagship artificial intelligence (“AI”) product, Presto Voice.” A copy of the SEC’s January 14, 2025 press release about the action may be found here. The agency’s January 14, 2025 Order in the proceeding can be found here.

Continue Reading SEC Files AI-Washing Enforcement Action Against Restaurant Technology Company

Among the most distinctive and important securities class action lawsuit filing trends this year has been the influx of new lawsuit based on alleged AI-related misrepresentations. In the latest example, on October 15, 2024, a plaintiff shareholder filed a securities class action lawsuit against China-based AI and robotics company, Xiao-I, in which the shareholder alleged financial reporting issues and also that the company overstated its AI capabilities. A copy of the October complaint against the company can be found here.

Continue Reading China-Based Company Hit with AI-Related Securities Suit

Over the last several months, various SEC spokespeople, including SEC Chair Gary Gensler, have issued strong precautionary statements against so-called “AI-washing,” which Microsoft Co-Pilot, an AI-powered tool, defines as a “deceptive marketing tactic where a product or service is promoted by exaggerating or falsely claiming the use of artificial intelligence.” The SEC has even issued an advisory warning investors against exaggerated or fraudulent AI-related claims.  In several prior enforcement actions, the SEC has made it clear that it is prepared to pursue those whom it deems to have engaged in AI-washing.

In the latest example of the SEC’s AI-washing focused enforcement activity, late last week the SEC announced that it had entered settled charges against an investment advisor, its principals, and related entities, alleging that the parties engaged in misrepresentations concerning the firms’ alleged used of AI to perform automated trading in clients’ accounts. The SEC’s October 10, 2024, press release regarding the action against Rimar Capital USA and related entities and individuals can be found here. The SEC’s October 10, 2024, administrative order in the matter can be found here.

Continue Reading Investment Advisory Firm Hit with AI-Washing SEC Enforcement Action

After the November 2022 debut of ChatGPT, the public commentariat pitched itself into a virtual frenzy declaring AI’s transformative or even catastrophic potential. However, from my perspective, the reality of AI, at least so far, is that, while AI-powered tools are sometimes impressive and occasionally amazing, the AI-generated results are sometimes clunky or non-responsive and often error-filed. I am skeptical of much of the AI hype.

However, over this past weekend, I used a new AI-powered tool that absolutely blew my mind. For the first time ever, I see the sheer raw potential of AI – and yes, I now see its transformative power as well.

Continue Reading I Can See the Future. You Can, Too. (Seriously. The Future. Except, You Know, Now.)

SEC officials have for months been signaling their concerns about companies overstating their AI credentials, a phenomenon that the officials and others have called “AI washing.” As set out and partially transcribed in a September 5, 2024, TheCorporateCounsel.net post (here), SEC Chair Gary Gensler recently recorded a video in which he reiterated concerns about public company AI-related disclosures and the need for companies to match AI-related claims to their actual capabilities. Nor are concerns about companies’ AI-related disclosures limited to the SEC; the tech community is also concerned about companies that overhype their AI qualifications, as illustrated in a September 4, 2024 TechBrew post (here).  

Another audience is also monitoring public companies’ AI-related disclosures – the class action plaintiffs’ lawyers. The number of securities class action lawsuits based on allegedly misleading statements concerning AI continues to grow. In the latest example, on September 4, 2024, a plaintiff shareholder filed a securities suit against software development platform GitLab alleging that the company misled investors by overstating the company’s ability to develop AI software features that would increase market demand for the company’s software development platform. A copy of the complaint can be found here.

Continue Reading Software Development Platform Hit with AI-Related Securities Suit