tariffs

Subscribe to tariffs via RSS

In prior posts (most recently here), I have noted the risk to companies in the current global trade environment of governmental enforcement actions relating to the collection and payment of tariffs. Indeed, in a May 12, 2025, memo, Assistant Attorney General Matthew Galeotti identified “trade and customs fraud, including tariff evasion” as the Department of Justice’s number two corporate criminal enforcement priority.

In the latest sign that the Trump administration is ready to aggressively deploy its enforcement tools to ensure compliance with tariffs and other trade goals, the U.S. government has filed a complaint in intervention in a pending qui tam action against a South Carolina furniture company, alleging that the company used false documentation to underreport the price of furniture the company imported from China, resulting in tariff underpayment. The new case underscores the fact that as the current Trump rolls out and enforces its sweeping tariff program, companies will face significant scrutiny and potential claims risk.Continue Reading Trump Administration Brings Tariff Evasion Claim

In numerous public statements, Trump Administration officials have said the Administration intends to use the False Claims Act (FCA) to enforce certain policy priorities. For example, in connection with statements concerning the Administration’s intent to combat “illegal DEI,” officials have declared that corporate DEI policies or practices violating anti-discrimination laws could trigger FCA liability.  There are a number of levels on which potential FCA liability represents a serious corporate liability risk, not least because of the possibility of whistleblowers (including company employees or competitors) launching FCA whistleblower claims. In addition, as discussed below, a recent Southern District of New York ruling highlights how potentially massive FCA liability can be.Continue Reading More About the Trump Administration and Potential False Claims Act Liability

Sarah Abrams

As I have noted in previous post on this site (most recently here), the Trump Administration’s tariff and trade policies not only pose potential operating and financial challenges to many businesses, but they may also present companies with corporate liability exposures as well. In the following guest post, Sarah Abrams, Head of Claims Baleen Specialty, a division of Bowhead Specialty, considers the liability risks that companies may face under the current tariff regime. I would like to thank Sarah for allowing me to publish her article as a guest post on this site. I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. Please contact me directly if you would like to submit a guest post. Here is Sarah’s article.Continue Reading Guest Post: Whiplash

As the Trump administration has launched, postponed, reinstated, and negotiated its evolving tariff policies, companies have been forced to deal with a changing and unpredictable business environment. As I have previously discussed, these changing circumstances not only have implications for companies’ business operations and financial results, they also have implications for companies’ potential liability exposures as well. One important area of tariff-related potential liability has to do with companies’ disclosures – that is, what the companies are saying about the impact of the tariffs on their operations and financial results.Continue Reading Tariffs and Disclosures: Corporate Risks in a Global Trade War

Earlier this month, when President Trump announced comprehensive tariffs, I speculated about whether or not the administration’s new tariff policy could create an environment that could lead to legal claims against some companies and their directors and offices. While I anticipated (and continue to anticipate) the possibility that there will be tariff-related D&O claims, one possibility I had not considered is the prospect that the new U.S. tariff regime could lead to increased number of tariff-related False Claims Act claims.

In an interesting April 16, 2025, memo, the Nixon Peabody law firm explains how “evasion of tariff requirements, including via false representation of countries of origin and undervaluation or misclassification of goods, creates the risk of substantial liability under the False Claims Act.” The law firm’s memo can be found here. (Hat Tip: John Jenkins of The CorporateCounsel.net Blog, who linked to the law firm memo in his April 23, 2025, post on the blog.)Continue Reading Trump’s Tariffs and the Risk of False Claims Act Liability

In a move that the Wall Street Journal described as having the effect of “bringing down the curtain on U.S. support for the turbocharged globalization that powered the world economy for decades,” on April 2, 2025, President Trump announced the imposition of massive new tariff duties on what the Journal described as “trillions of dollars in imports.” The U.S.’s imposition of these tariffs has huge implications for international trade; the U.S. economy; the economies of other countries around the world; and the fortunes and prospects of individual companies seeking to operate in an increasingly fraught global economy. These developments also have significant implications for the potential liabilities of companies and their directors and officers, as discussed below.Continue Reading Massive New U.S. Tariffs:  What Are the Potential D&O Liability Implications?

As I have previously noted on this site, several international trade regulatory regimes have become increasingly important for companies and their executives. These regulatory regimes include U.S. sanctions, export controls, anti-money laundering (AML), and anti-bribery and corruption laws. Recent developments, such as the War in Ukraine, trade tensions with China, and issues involving digital assets have heightened these concerns. Violations of these regimes can result in regulatory enforcement actions as well as in related civil litigation.

The latest example of a civil action following in the wake of a trade regulation enforcement action is the lawsuit filed earlier this week against data storage company Seagate Technology Holdings plc, after the company was hit with a U.S. Department of Commerce administrative penalty for violation of Export Administration Regulations (EAR) pertaining to the Chinese technology company, Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. The recently filed securities suit shows how international trade regulation and enforcement can translate into corporate and securities litigation. A copy of the July 10, 2023, Seagate complaint can be found here.Continue Reading Trade and Export Control Enforcement Leads to Securities Class Action Suit