Third-party litigation funding continues to attract investors, as evidenced by relatively new litigation funding firm Gerchen Keller Capital’s recent $260 million capital raise, which brings their total investor commitments to $310 million (as discussed in a January 12, 2013 New York Times article, here). As litigation has become more prevalent, courts have had
What’s Happening Now? Litigation Funding, Apparently
Third-Party litigation funding’s moment may have already be here, as I have previously noted. But just the same, it is a little surprising to find stories about litigation funding at virtually every turn, with stories over the weekend appearing, for example, in The Economist and in the Wall Street Journal, among other publications.
Has the “Litigation Funding Moment” Arrived?
In last week’s Advisen webinar on 2012 D&O claims trends, one of the audience questions related to the growth and relevance of litigation funding in the U.S. In responding to the question I noted, among other things, the rise of litigation funding outside the U.S., particularly in Australia and Canada – a point I underscored
Litigation Funding: A U.S. Growth Industry?
Litigation funding has long been a significant part of commercial litigation landscape outside the U.S. For example, in Australia, observers have attributed the growth in securities litigation to the availability of litigation funding. Litigation funding arrangements have also recently been approved in connection with securities class action litigation in Canada. Litigation funding has been available
A Closer Look at Litigation Funding and the “Loser Pays” Model
Among the reasons frequently cited for the higher incidence of litigation in the United States compared to the rest of the world is the acceptability of contingent fees for plaintiffs’ counsel and general rules that each party to a lawsuit in the U.S. bears its own costs. Many other countries have a “loser pays” model