FDIC

Subscribe to FDIC via RSS
Sarah Abrams

One of the more interesting emerging phenomena involving cryptocurrencies has been the recent rise of crypto treasury companies – that is, companies whose primary purpose is acquiring and holding cryptocurrencies as part of their corporate treasury. There arguably are a host of concerns with these kinds of firms. Among other things, and as discussed in the guest post below from Sarah Abrams, there may be issues for these kinds of firms in connection with FDIC deposit insurance disclosure requirements. Sarah is Head of Claims Baleen Specialty, a division of Bowhead Specialty. I would like to thank Sarah for allowing me to publish her article as a guest post on this site.Continue Reading Guest Post: FDIC Advertising Rule and Crypto Treasuries

Here at The D&O Diary we try to follow the latest events. And while we think it is important to keep track of what is happening now, we also think it is important to keep things in perspective. It is particularly important to maintain a historical perspective. It is for that reason that we read with interest a recent speech by outgoing FDIC Chair Martin Gruenberg, in which he gave a retrospective overview of the three banking crises of the last four decades, as well as a reflection of the lessons to be learned. Gruenberg’s speech is must reading for anyone that wants to understand the prior banking crises, as well as to appreciate the risks that may lie ahead. The text of Gruenberg’s January 14, 2025 speech can be found here.Continue Reading The Lessons of Three Financial Crises

The FDIC as receiver of the failed Silicon Valley Bank has filed a negligence and breach of fiduciary duty action against the bank’s former directors and officers. The complaint alleges that it the FDIC’s lawsuit is “a case of egregious mismanagement of interest-rate and liquidity risks by the Bank’s former officers and directors.” The complaint seeks to recover the “billions of dollars in damages caused by the negligence, gross negligence, and breaches of fiduciary duty.” A copy of the FDIC’s complaint can be found here.Continue Reading FDIC Files Liability Action Against Former SVB Executives

The March 2023 collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) is long enough ago that it in many ways seems like ancient history. The fact is that the bank’s failure was the second largest in U.S. history, and its collapse continues to cast a shadow over the U.S. banking industry. Private civil litigation against company executives, on behalf of investors and others, followed immediately in the wake of the bank’s collapse, but at least until now the post-collapse lawsuits have not included an action by the FDIC, as often follows after a bank failure. However, as discussed below, on December 17, 2024, the FDIC’s Board of Directors voted unanimously to authorize the agency staff’s request for authorization to file a suit against six former officers and 11 former directors of SVB and its holding company, SVB Financial Group.Continue Reading FDIC Board of Directors Authorizes Suit Against SVB Officials

The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank is one of those singular events, charged with implications and fraught with dangerous possibilities, but that is also still so recent that it is difficult to discern what it ultimately will mean. Earlier this week, in an excellent webinar presented by the Rock Center for Corporate Governance at the…

By Monday morning of this week, two banks had failed in quick sequence, including the very high-profile collapse last week of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and the closure over the weekend of Signature Bank. SVB got hit with a securities class action lawsuit yesterday, so what had to happen next? Why, a securities suit against Signature Bank, of course. On Tuesday morning, the same plaintiffs’ law firm that sued SVB on Monday filed a separate securities class action lawsuit against Signature Bank and three of its executives. How much further any of this goes from here is the question on everyone’s minds. A copy of the Signature Bank complaint can be found here.Continue Reading SVB Got Sued, So, What Next? A Suit Against Signature Bank, Of Course

Federal Reserve Building, Washington, D.C.

The Federal Reserve wants bank directors and senior executives  to know that while their D&O insurance policies are “an important risk mitigation tool,” their policies could contain exclusions that could “potentially limit coverage” and leave them without insurance in the event of a claim. In a July 23, 2019 letter (here), the Fed informed banks and other financial institutions of the risks associated with exclusionary provisions in D&O insurance policies and urged board members and senior executives to “understand fully the protections and limitations” that the D&O insurance policies provide. As discussed below, the Fed’s guidance is good advice for directors and senior executives of any organization, not just for banks. An August 3, 2019 post on the Willis Towers Watson blog about the Fed letter can be found here.
Continue Reading The Fed Has a Message for Banks about D&O Insurance          

In the latest twist in a long-running legal saga, on March 15, 2019, the FDIC announced that it had reached a $335 million settlement of the negligence action the agency had brought against PwC in connection with the accounting firm’s audit work for the defunct Colonial Bank. The curious thing about this settlement is that it represents only a little more half of the amount that a federal district court judge awarded the FDIC as damages in a July 2018 order in the case. The FDIC’s terse March 15, 2019 press release announcing the settlement can be found here.
Continue Reading FDIC Settles PwC Colonial Bank Negligence Action for $335 Million

Want some good news? During calendar year 2018, there were exactly zero bank failures in the United States. Zero. Nil. Nada. Zilch. The last time there were no U.S. bank failures was waaaay back in 2006. Needless to say, a lot has happened since then. But the best part of all is that because of a strong economy, and because of the purifying effects of the financial refiners’ fire, the banking sector is as healthy as it has been in many years. Hugh Son’s January 10, 2019 CNBC article about the U.S. banks’ current healthy state can be found here.
Continue Reading Here’s Some Good News: No Bank Failures

In a January 23, 2018 unpublished decision (here), the Eleventh Circuit held that a D&O insurance policy’s prior acts exclusion does not preclude coverage where the subsequent claim against insured persons is “independent” from the alleged wrongful acts that occurred prior to the policy period. The appellate court’s opinion, in which it affirmed a district court’s ruling rejecting a D&O insurer’s argument that the exclusion precluded coverage for the FDIC’s claim against the former directors and officers of a failed bank, underscores the necessity for a link between the prior wrongful acts and the subsequent claim in order for the exclusion to preclude coverage for the claim. The Carlton Fields law firm’s February 26, 2018 memo about the decision can be found here.
Continue Reading Prior Acts Exclusion Does Not Preclude Coverage Where Subsequent Claim Independent from Alleged Prior Acts