I am pleased to present below a guest post from Angelo G. Savino of the Cozen O’Connor law firm discussing the Southern District of New York’s application of the Morrison decision in an SEC enforcement action pending against Goldman Sachs employee Fabrice Tourre. This guest post will also be published and distributed in the future as
O.K., F-Cubed Claims Are Out, But What About F-Squared Claims?
The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision last month in the Morrison v. National Australia Bank case made it clear U.S. securities laws do not allow so-called "f-cubed" cases — securities claims against foreign domiciled companies and brought by foreign-domiciled claimants who purchased their company shares on foreign exchanges — in U.S. courts. The securities laws, the
More Thoughts About Morrison v. National Australia Bank
It was obvious from the first reading that the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. National Australia Bank represents a sweeping victory for the defendants. As I noted in my initial post after the decision came down, the Court’s holding that plaintiffs can’t pursue fraud claims for securities purchased on foreign exchanges will
Supreme Court Limits Foreign Investors’ Access to U.S. Courts
In a long-awaited ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court on June 24, 2010 issued an opinion affirming dismissal of the Morrison v. National Australia Bank case. Among other things, the Court’s opinion will limit securities claims by investors who bought their shares on foreign exchanges. This ruling could have a dramatic impact on many pending cases as well
The “Vexing” Question of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (Corrected Version)
Editor’s Note: The corrected post is being republished to remedy an error in the prior email notification. The National Australia Bank case now awaiting decision before the United States Supreme Court raises what the Second Circuit in that same case called "the vexing question of the extraterritorial application of the [U.S.] securities laws." But while we
Big Securities Law Doings in D.C.: Supreme Court, Congress Gear Up
Courts in the financial center of New York and the tech hotspot of California tend to be where much of the headline grabbing securities law action usually takes place. But this week, the most significant action is in Washington, D.C., as the Supreme Court and Congress are weighing into several of the hottest topic under
Guest Post: Foreign-Cubed Litigation – Developments at the Supreme Court
The D&O Diary is pleased to present the following guest blog post, written by Angelo Savino (pictured), a partner at the Cozen & O’Connor law firm. Angelo is resident in the firm’s New York office. Angelo’s guest blog post follows:
As noted in prior posts (here), the U.S. Supreme Court is considering whether
Vivendi Securities Suit Goes to Trial
In a rare case in which a securities suit is actually going to trial, on Monday a jury was empanelled in the Vivendi securities class action lawsuit pending in the Southern District of New York. An October 5, 2009 New York Times article summarizing the background of the case can be found here. A
More About Extraterritoriality and the U.S. Securities Laws
While we wait to see whether the U.S. Supreme Court will grant the pending petition for a writ of certiorari in connection with the Second Circuit’s recent landmark opinion in the Morrison v, National Australia Bank case, the lower courts must continue to wrestle with questions regarding the extraterritorial application of the U.S. securities laws
Ninth Circuit Rejects Securities Case Based on FCPA Disclosures
In a November 26, 2008 opinion (here), the Ninth Circuit affirmed the lower court’s dismissal of a lawsuit asserting securities law violations against InVision and certain of its directors and officers based on FCPA-related disclosures. The case is noteworthy not only for its involvement of FCPA-related allegations, but also for the appellate court’s