

On May 12, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) Criminal Division announced significant changes in its policies on investigating and prosecuting white collar crime. In its memo announcing the new policies, and in subsequent statements, the agency signaled its intent to refine enforcement priorities, encourage self-disclosure, and increase efficiency in investigations. In the following guest post, Michael W. Peregrine and Ashley Hoff of the McDermott Will & Emery law firm review the agency’s new policies and consider the policies’ potential director and officer liability implications. I would like to thank Michael and Ashley for allowing me to publish their article on this site. I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. Please contact me directly if you would like to submit a guest post. Here is Michael and Ashley’s article.Continue Reading Guest Post: New DOJ White Collar Enforcement Policy Pressures Caremark Obligations

In the following guest post, Francis Kean takes a look at the lessons from the U.K. Serious Fraud Office’s recent attempts to criminally prosecute executives of companies that have entered into a deferred prosecution agreement. Francis is a Partner, Financial Lines, at McGill and Partners. A version of this article previously was published as an alert for clients of McGill and Partners. I would like to thank Francis for allowing me to publish this article as a guest post on this site. I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this blog’s readers. Please contact me directly if you would like to submit a guest post. Here is Francis’s article.


I spend the better part of most days – both in my day job and in writing this blog – thinking about the liabilities of directors and officers. Most of the time I am focused on their civil liabilities. However, even though it is not something I think about all the time, the fact is that the potential liabilities of corporate executives also include criminal liabilities as well. I thought about this recently in reviewing a July 3, 2018 Bloomberg article entitled “From Executive Suit to Jail: One German CEO’s Tales of Prison” (
A recurring question – one that I am getting now on just about a daily basis – arises from concerns about the Trump administration’s possible impact on the world of directors’ and officers’ liability. Implicit in the question is the assumption that the new administration’s policies and actions will indeed affect D&O claims. While I agree with this assumption – that the new administration’s actions will have an impact–at this point it is still far too early to tell what that impact might be. For now, I think all we can do is watch some key indicators. In this blog post, I review what I think are the key indicators, and what the indicators may tell us about what lies ahead for D&O claims.