Corporate prosecutions

Subscribe to Corporate prosecutions via RSS

Those trying to gauge what Trump 2.0 means for directors’ and officers’ liability will want to read the Wall Street Journal’s April 13, 2025, article entitled “Trump Administration Retreats from White-Collar Criminal Enforcement” (here). The article contains statements of large law firm partners expressing their anxiety that the administration’s approach to white-collar crime prosecution will mean “significant slowdown” in law firm revenue from criminal defense work. But what may be bad news for law firms could be good news for corporate executives, because the Trump administration’s approach may mean corporate executives could face a reduced risk of criminal prosecution, at least for certain kinds of criminal allegations.Continue Reading Do Trump Admin Policies Mean Reduced Risk of White-Collar Prosecutions?

dojIn a September 9, 2015 memo from Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, the U.S. Department of Justice described a new policy focused on individual accountability for corporate wrongdoing. The keystone of the policy embodied in the Yates memo is that for companies to receive any cooperation credit, they must completely disclosure “all relevant facts about individual misconduct.”  According to an interesting May 26, 2016 memo from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Institute for Legal Reform entitled “DOJ’s New Threshold for Cooperation” (here), the agency’s new threshold for cooperation credit is “likely to have a number of unintended consequences.” Among other things, the report notes, the new policy risks alienating personnel whose cooperation is essential to the investigation, and indeed may motivate individuals to seek individual counsel. These and other potential unintended consequences may mean that the agency’s new policy may have a counterproductive impact on corporate cooperation.
Continue Reading Will the Yates Memo’s Emphasis on Individual Prosecution Have A Counterproductive Impact?