There was a time, not that long ago, when ESG was the dominant topic in the corporate governance world. Every company was expected to have a sustainability plan and to maintain a respectable ESG profile. However, as a result of now years-long ESG backlash, the predominance of ESG as a governance topic has diminished. Indeed, with the Trump administration’s active anti-ESG policies and actions, including among other things several anti-ESG executive orders, as well as the actions of several red state governors and legislatures, it now sometimes feels that ESG as a governance topic is in full retreat. However, two recent developments – including a court decision striking down a Texas state anti-ESG law and the filing of ESG-supportive ERISA liability lawsuit – suggest that, at a minimum, there may be more of the ESG story yet to be told.Continue Reading Countering Anti-ESG Backlash

Readers of this blog are well aware that “ESG” (whatever that term may mean) is one of the hot topics in the financial and business sectors. Companies face scrutiny and pressure to show that they are making progress on ESG goals. The SEC has established an ESG task force and proposed climate change disclosure rules. Now, as if all of that were not enough, political reaction is giving rise to an ESG backlash. As detailed in two recent memos from the Morgan Lewis law firm (here and here), as many as 17 states have now adopted “anti-ESG” state legislation that would limit the ability of state governments, including public retirement plans, to do business with entities “boycotting” industries based on ESG criteria or considering ESG factors in their investment processes.
Continue Reading And Now, The ESG Backlash