AI Washing

Subscribe to AI Washing via RSS

The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) technology presents an enormous opportunity for many companies and indeed for commerce generally. It also presents an enormous challenge for companies trying to establish themselves as one of the winners in the AI scramble. Among the prominent companies involved in this scramble are several of the technology giants, including, for example, Microsoft, a company that, at least according to press reports, recently has faced some challenges with its AI product, Copilot.

Now, the company has been hit with a securities suit alleging the company overstated its AI prospects and success, while downplaying the difficulties it was facing. The complaint illustrates many of the important features of the  still-emerging AI-related litigation. A copy of the June 12, 2026, complaint against Microsoft can be found here.

Continue Reading Microsoft Hit with AI-Related Securities Suit

One of the interesting features of the rise of AI has been the advent of “AI-and” businesses – that is, businesses whose strategy is to apply AI tools to traditional business models. When “AI-and” business results fall short, securities litigation has sometimes followed. In the latest example of this kind of litigation, earlier this week a plaintiff shareholder filed a securities suit against Upstart Holdings, a company whose business model involves applying AI tools to traditional credit rating and lending services, after the results from the company’s AI-updated credit rating tool disappointed investors. A copy of the new Upstart Holdings complaint can be found here.

Continue Reading Lending Platform Hit with AI-Related Securities Suit

Among the challenges companies face as they incorporate AI into their business strategies is accurately projecting the impact the AI-based approach will have on their business and financial results. Business outcomes may fall short of expectations to the disappointment of investors, which in turn can lead to securities litigation. In the latest example of this phenomenon, investors sued the Israeli-based software company Monday.com after it adjusted its earnings guidance as its AI-based strategy unfolded differently than the company had projected. A copy of the March 10, 2026, complaint against the company can be found here.

Continue Reading AI-Related Securities Suit Filed Against Israeli Software Company
Mayme Donahue

In recent months, the SEC’s position with respect to AI regulation and enforcement has emerged, with important implications for reporting companies. In the following guest post, Mayme Donohue, a partner in the Hunton Andrews Kurth law firm takes a detailed look at the SEC’s emerging approach and provides specific pointers for reporting companies’ AI-related disclosures. I would like to thank Mayme for allowing me to publish her article as a guest post on this site. Here is Mayme’s article.

Continue Reading Guest Post: AI, the SEC, and the 2026 Reporting Season

The filing of AI-Washing related securities suits is by now a well-established phenomenon. But a securities suit filed earlier this week presents an interesting new variant on this phenomenon. The new lawsuit alleges that the defendant company used the announcement of a supposed AI-related “collaboration” with Microsoft allegedly to “pump” the company’s share price just before disclosing an at-the-market private placement. As discussed below, the new lawsuit is just the latest in a recent series of securities class action lawsuits alleging share price pumping schemes.

Continue Reading Securities Suit Alleges AI-Washing Stock Price “Pump”

In my recent year-end roundup of the top D&O stories of 2025, one key topic I noted was the significance of AI-related corporate and securities litigation during the year. 2026 has only just started, but it already seems likely that AI-related litigation will be an important theme again in the new year, as well. In the latest example of this phenomenon, earlier this week a plaintiff shareholder filed a securities class action lawsuit against AI infrastructure company CoreWeave. As discussed below, there are a number of interesting features to this latest lawsuit. A copy of the January 12, 2026, CoreWeave complaint can be found here.

Continue Reading AI Infrastructure Company Hit with AI-Related Securities Suit
Emma Bailey
James Parsons

As this blog’s readers know, AI is not only an emerging technological phenomenon it is also a potentially disruptive source of D&O risk and liability. In the following guest post, Emma Bailey and James Parsons, take a look at the contours of the developing AI-related D&O risk and discuss the implications. Emma is Senior Underwriter, Commercial Management Liability, Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance, London, and James is Senior Claims Examiner, Executive & Professional Liability, Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance, London. I would like to thank James and Emma for allowing me to publish their article as a guest post on this site. I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. Please contact me directly if you would like to submit a guest post. Here is the authors’ article.

Continue Reading Guest Post: Is AI Reshaping D&O Litigation?

In the latest AI-washing related securities class action lawsuit to be filed, a plaintiff shareholder has filed a securities suit against AI-based health care company Tempus AI, alleging, among other things, that the company overstated its AI capabilities. The lawsuit comes after the company’s share price declined following the publication of a short seller report critical of the company and its management. A copy of the June 12, 2025, complaint against Tempus AI can be found here.

Continue Reading AI-Washing Securities Suit Filed Against Tempus AI

In parallel actions last week, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York and the SEC charged a tech exec with securities fraud in connection with fundraising for his company based on misrepresentations about the company’s AI capabilities. The exec, Albert Saniger, allegedly raised over $42 million by misrepresenting to investors that his company’s app used AI technology to complete online shopping purchases, when in fact the purchases were completed manually by contract workers located in the Philippines and elsewhere. As discussed below, there are several interesting features to these AI-related allegations.

Continue Reading Tech Exec Charged with AI Washing-Related Securities Fraud

A recurring theme at the recent PLUS D&O Symposium related to the risks associated with the rise of artificial intelligence (AI), risks that may among other things translate into D&O claims. Among other AI-related litigation concerns is the fear that companies seeking to catch some of the AI buzz will overstate their AI prospects. Last week, in the latest examples of the kinds of AI-related D&O claims that can arise, two companies were sued in separate securities lawsuits alleging that the companies overstated their AI capabilities or prospects – a phenomenon that has been described as “AI washing.”

Continue Reading Two Companies Hit with Separate AI-Washing Securities Lawsuits