In the latest securities class action lawsuit to be filed against a post-SPAC-merger electric vehicle company, a plaintiff shareholder has filed a securities suit against the EV company Arrival SA, following the company’s announcement in November 2021 of a slowdown in its production schedule and of the company’s need to raise additional capital. As discussed below, the new lawsuit against Arrival has several characteristics in common with other SPAC-related securities suits that have been filed this year. A copy of the complaint that was filed against Arrival on December 22, 2021 can be found here. Continue Reading Yet Another Post-SPAC-Merger Electric Vehicle Company Hit with Securities Suit

As I monitored the coronavirus-related securities litigation as it has been filed since March 2020, I had observed that the cases generally fell into one of three categories: cases involving companies that had experienced a coronavirus outbreak in their facilities; companies that had claimed that they would be able to profit from the pandemic; and companies whose operations or finances were disrupted by the pandemic. Over the last several weeks, I have observed a new coronavirus-related variant, a fourth category of cases involving companies that had prospered at the outset because of pandemic restrictions, but whose fortunes ebbed as pandemic restrictions eased. Now, two more of these “fourth category” variant cases have been filed, one involving Docusign and one involving Chegg, as detailed below. Continue Reading Two New Cases of the Latest Coronavirus-Related Securities Suit Variant Filed

Nikola, the electric vehicle company that became a publicly traded company through a June 3, 2020 merger with a SPAC, has reached an agreement to pay $125 million to settle proceedings the SEC brought against the company relating to misrepresentations its former CEO Trevor Milton and the company made about the company’s EV production capabilities. In the settlement, the company neither admitted nor denied the SEC’s allegations. The SEC’s December 21, 2021 press release about the settlement can be found here. The SEC’s December 21, 2021 order instituting cease and desist proceedings against Nikola can be found here. The company’s December 21, 2021 press release about the settlement can be found here. Continue Reading Nikola Settles SEC Proceedings for $125 Million

As readers will recall, in a September 7, 2021 opinion, Delaware Vice Chancellor Morgan T. Zurn largely denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss in the Boeing Max 737 Shareholder Derivative Litigation. Two months later, the parties in the action settled the case for $237.5 million. In the following guest post, Suzanne H. Gilbert, H. Stephen Grace Jr., and S. Lawrence Prendergast examine Vice Chancellor Zurn’s Boeing opinion and consider its implications for directors’ board responsibilities. Suzanne H. Gilbert is a member of the Board of Advisors of Grace & Co. Consultancy, Inc.; H. Stephen Grace Jr., Ph.D., is President of H.S. Grace & Company, Inc.; and S. Lawrence Prendergast is a member of the Board of Advisors of Grace & Co. Consultancy, Inc. and is Chairman of the Turrell Fund. A version of this article previously was published in the American Bar Association’s Business Law Today. I would like to thank the authors for allowing me to publish their article as a guest post on this site. I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this blog’s readers. Please contact me directly if you would like to submit a guest post. The authors’ article follows. Continue Reading Guest Post: Boeing and the Ongoing Evolution of Director Responsibilities

As I noted at the time, earlier this year SEC Chair Gary Gensler spoke publicly about the need for revisions to Rule 10b5-1, the regulatory provision that allows corporate executives, subject to certain requirements, to trade in their holdings of their companies’ securities. Rule 10b5-1 has long been criticized because of perceived abuses. On December 15, 2021, the SEC released proposed revisions to the Rule. Among other things, the proposed revisions strengthen the requirements to access the affirmative defenses afforded under the Rule, and also enhance disclosure requirements for companies whose executives enter into trading plans pursuant to the Rule. The proposed changes are subject to a 45-day comment period after the proposed amendments are published in the Federal Register. Continue Reading SEC Proposes Amendments to Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plan Provisions

In the latest example of the kind of SPAC-related litigation that has been such a big part of the securities class action litigation filings this year, space infrastructure company Redwire Corporation, which merged with a publicly traded SPAC in September 2021, was hit with a securities class action lawsuit after the company delayed filing its third-quarter financial results. A copy of the December 17, 2021 complaint can be found here. Continue Reading SPAC-Related Securities Suit Filed Against Space Gear Company

Editor’s Note: Today’s Sunday Arts installment excerpts a post from my very earliest days of blogging. The May 25, 2006 post (here) appeared in a separate and now defunct blog called And Furthermore that I then maintained in parallel with what was then and remains now my principal blog, The D&O Diary.

 

One of the more interesting stories in the financial pages these days is the news surrounding the options backdating probes. As the options backdating story has continued to unfold, some have questioned whether or not there is actually anything wrong with options backdating. For example, the wsj.com law blog has a May 23, 2006 video post containing a debate between a business school prof and a CNBC reporter on the topic. Options backdating is obviously not harmless — the revelation of options backdating has already proven damaging to at least some of the companies caught up in the probe as they have had to restate their past financials to reflect their true compensation costs. But even beyond the restatement threat, there is a particular reason why the options backdating story has gained momentum in a way that stories about executives’ use of corporate aircraft or gold-plated pensions have not. Continue Reading Sunday Arts: Cheating at Cards

In early January 2022,  I will be publishing on this site my annual survey of the Top Ten Stories in D&O. On Thursday, January 13, 2022, my colleague Marissa Streckfus and I will be hosting a one-hour webinar on the topic of “The Top Ten D&O Stories of 2021.”  We will be discussing the key developments of 2021 affecting the liability exposures of corporate directors and officers — including  securities litigation trends, SPAC-related litigation, litigation arising from COVID-19, D&O claims arising from cybersecurity incidents, the rise of the duty of oversight claims, and so much more. This free session will begin at 11:00 am EST. I hope that all of my loyal readers will attend. To register for the webinar, please refer here.

Among the significant constraints in the current business and financial environment is the continuing disruption of corporate supply chains. The disruption is a side-effect of the pandemic that has been exacerbated by weather events and other developments. I have been concerned that supply-chain disruption could not only interfere with ongoing business operations but could, for companies experiencing significant setbacks, lead to D&O claims, including securities class action lawsuits. There have in fact been prior securities suits filed this year arising out of supply chain issues.

 

The latest securities suit to reflect this phenomenon is the securities class action lawsuit filed on December 14, 2021 against bed and mattress manufacturer Sleep Number Corporation, whose supply sources for mattress foam was disrupted by the Texas winter storms earlier this year. This latest lawsuit illustrates how supply chain issues can translate into D&O claims. As discussed below, this new lawsuit raises a number of interesting questions about possible future claims. Continue Reading Supply Chain Disruption Leads to Securities Suit Against Mattress Manufacturer

Jeffrey Lubitz

In the following guest post, Jeffrey Lubitz, Executive Director of ISS Securities Class Action Services, takes a look at securities class action settlements in 2021, including aggregate figures and the largest individual settlements during the year. Jeff also notes several important trends and developments in collective investor actions outside the U.S during 2021. A version of this article previously was published on the ISS Insights blog (here). Please note that the 2021 figures below are preliminary; the final calculations will be published in January 2022. The 2021 settlement figures include all settlements with a settlement hearing date between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2021; some hearings currently scheduled to take place before year end potentially could be pushed into 2022, which would shift the settlement into the 2022 settlement year. I would like to thank Jeff for allowing me to publish his article as a guest post on this site. I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this blog’s readers. Please contact me directly if you would like to submit a guest post. Here is Jeff’s article. Continue Reading Guest Post: Shareholder Class Action Settlements Continue Strong Pace in 2021