In the latest development in the long-running lawsuit that is among the very few securities cases to actually have gone to trial, the Ninth Circuit – in its second crack at the case – affirmed the district court’s dismissal. The Ninth Circuit’s August 9, 2010 opinion (here) in the Thane International securities class
NERA Releases Updated Study of Japanese Securities Litigation
The amount of damages awarded in 2009 Japanese securities cases exceeded "the aggregate amount of securities litigation damages determined by court decisions in Japan for the entire previous decade," according to a new study of Japanese securities litigation from NERA Economic Consulting. The report, dated August 2, 2010 and entitled "Trends in Japanese Securities Litigation:
Guest Post: A Response to the Vivendi Plaintiffs About Morrison v. National Australia Bank.
Earlier this week, I hosted a guest post from the counsel for the plaintiffs in the Vivendi securities class action lawsuit, in which plaintiffs’ counsel summarized their position on the impact that the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. National Australia Bank had on their case.
In response to their post, University of
First-Filed Subprime Securities Suit Settles for $125 Million
The New Century Financial securities class action lawsuit – which was the first of the subprime-related securities class action lawsuits when it was filed in February 2007 – has been settled for $124,827,088, subject to court approval. The plaintiffs’ July 30, 2010 unopposed motion for settlement approval can be found here.
The settlement
Guest Post: Vivendi Plaintiffs’ Argument on the Impact of Morrison v. National Australia Bank
In a series of recent posts (most recently here), I have been taking a look at the practical impact that the U.S. Supreme Court’s June 24, 2010 decision in Morrison v. National Australia Bank will have on securities litigation in the United States involving non-U.S. companies. Among the cases seemingly most impacted by the
Cornerstone Releases Mid-Year 2010 Securities Class Action Litigation Study
On July 28, 2010, Cornerstone Research and the Stanford Law School Securities Class Action Clearinghouse issued the most recent entry in the series of mid-year 2010 securities class action litigation studies. Its report, entitled "Securities Class Action Litigation: 2010 Mid-Year Assessment" can be found here. The related July 28 press release can be found
Morrison Precludes F-Squared Cases, Too, Court Concludes
The Supreme Court’s decision last month in the Morrison v. National Australia Bank precludes so-called "f-cubed" claims (claims brought by foreign plaintiffs who bought foreign stock on a foreign exchange). An unanswered question is whether Morrison also precludes "f-squared" claims – that is, claims by Americans who bought their shares of foreign companies on foreign
NERA Releases Mid-Year 2010 Securities Litigation Study
Largely as a result in the decline of the number of new credit crisis related cases, the number of new securities class action lawsuits filings is "on track to decline for a second successive year from their 2008 peak," according to a NERA Economic Consulting report entitled "Trends 2010 Mid-Year Study: Filings Decline as the
Are Securities Class Action Opt-Outs Back?
A couple of years ago, a "worrisome trend" developed in securities class action litigation, in which large institutional investors began routinely opting out of plaintiff class to separately pursue their own individual claims under the securities laws. The settlement of these individual opt out actions in many cases rivaled, in the aggregate, the amount of
O.K., F-Cubed Claims Are Out, But What About F-Squared Claims?
The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision last month in the Morrison v. National Australia Bank case made it clear U.S. securities laws do not allow so-called "f-cubed" cases — securities claims against foreign domiciled companies and brought by foreign-domiciled claimants who purchased their company shares on foreign exchanges — in U.S. courts. The securities laws, the